|
Financial Performance & Scoring -- © 2005 Gaskins IPO Desktop/IPOdesktop |
|
|
Analysis of 15 Biotech, Biopharma, Medical Device, Medical-related pre-IPO companies |
|
|
. Opening Premium Star Ratings: |
1-Star--Flat to up $0.38; 2-Stars--Up $0.50 to $1; |
|
|
|
3-Stars-UP $1 to $3; 4-Stars--$4 and higher; 5-Stars--Moonshot, 100% plus |
|
. Business Model Rating Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A = high growth market, potential leader; B = more competitive market; C='public venture capital' |
|
. Calculations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. IPO Price to annualized Sales Ratio -- (Price / Sales) |
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
IPO market capitalization… |
Annualized Sales (last quarter's revenues times 4) |
|
|
(post-IPO # of shares times mid-point of IPO price range) |
|
|
|
|
. IPO Price to annualized Earnings (loss) -- (Price / Earnings) |
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
IPO market cap |
|
Annualized Earnings (loss) from the last quarter |
|
|
========================================================================= |
|
SEARCH BY COMPANY |
Use 'Edit, find on this page' to search for companies |
|
=================================== |
|
|
|
|
|
VALUATION RATIOS |
IPO Mrkt |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
% offered |
|
|
Cap (mm) |
Sales |
Earnings |
BookValue |
TangibleBV |
in IPO |
|
March 8 |
CombinatoRx (CRXX |
223 |
n/a |
-10.0 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
30% |
|
new medicines from synergistic combinations of approved drugs |
Post-IPO shrs:20.3mm |
|
March 4 |
AsprevaPharma ASPV |
461 |
124.7 |
-19.2 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
22% |
|
commercializes approved drugs |
|
|
|
Post-IPO shrs:32.95mm |
|
Feb 25 |
Targacept (TRGT) |
244 |
66.1 |
-10.2 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
31% |
|
biopharmaceutical |
|
|
|
|
Post-IPO shrs:20.37mm |
|
Jan 21 |
ViaCell (VIAC) |
289 |
3.2 |
26.7 |
4.0 |
4.4 |
21% |
|
biotechnology company enabling the use of human cells as medicine |
Post-IPO shrs:36.1mm |
|
Dec 14 |
Conor Med (CONR) |
368 |
n/a |
-17 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
16% |
|
stents for vascular drug delivery |
|
|
|
Post-IPO:30.7mm shrs |
|
Dec 10 |
Adeza Biomd (ADZA) |
239 |
7.3 |
39 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
24% |
|
patented diagnostic test, the Fetal Fibronectin Test |
|
Post-IPO:15.9 mm shrs |
|
Dec6midwk |
CABG Med (CABG) |
87 |
n/a |
-30 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
35% |
|
artificial coronary graft system |
|
|
|
Post-IPO: 15.8 mm shrs |
|
Dec 8 |
OccuLogix (RHEO) |
376 |
622.3 |
63 |
1.7 |
8.0 |
20% |
|
innovative treatments for eye diseases |
|
|
Post-IPO:41.76mm shrs |
|
Dec 9 |
SYMMETRY Md SMA |
459 |
2.2 |
31 |
2.5 |
11.0 |
24% |
|
implants, elated instruments & cases for orthopedic device manufacturers. |
Post-IPO: 32.8mm shrs |
|
Oct 20 |
VNUS Medical (VNUS) |
192 |
5.6 |
112 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
35% |
|
medical devices for minimally invasive treatment of venous reflux disease |
|
|
|
Oct 14 |
CoTherix (CTRX) |
176 |
n/a |
-5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
26% |
|
biopharmaceutical: therapeutics for life threatening diseases. |
|
|
|
Oct 7 |
IntraLase (ILSE) |
305 |
6.0 |
-38 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
26% |
|
laser technology for the first step of LASIK surgery |
|
|
|
|
Sept 28 |
Theravance (THRX) |
583 |
81.0 |
-6 |
2.9 |
3.6 |
12% |
|
biopharmaceutical company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 23 |
Cogent Sys (COGT) |
741 |
10.8 |
49 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
23% |
|
provider of Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems, or AFIS |
|
|
|
Sept 22 |
Nephros (NEP) |
78 |
n/a |
-11 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
32% |
|
development stage medical device and technology company |
|
|
|
|
========================================================================= |
|
SEARCH BY COMPANY |
Use 'Edit, find on this page' to search for companies |
|
=================================== |
|
|
|
|
|
pre-IPO scheduled date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 8 |
CombinatoRx |
CRXX, 2-Stars, C |
|
|
|
|
|
new medicines from synergistic combinations of approved drugs |
Post-IPO shrs:20.3mm |
|
Boston, MA |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
IPO Mkt |
|
|
Revenue ($mm) |
none |
none |
none |
none |
Cap (mm) |
|
|
R&D |
3.8 |
9.9 |
12.1 |
15.9 |
$223 |
|
|
Income (loss) ($mm) |
-$5.6 |
-$13.6 |
-$16.3 |
-$22.3 |
@$11 |
|
|
VALUATION RATIOS |
IPO Mrkt |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
% offered |
|
|
Cap (mm) |
Sales |
Earnings |
BookValue |
TangibleBV |
in IPO |
|
March 8 |
CombinatoRx (CRXX), CRXX, 2-Stars |
223 |
n/a |
-10.0 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
30% |
|
SCORECARD |
|
Mgt |
Market |
Market Do- |
Proprie- |
Total |
|
1-5, 5 is high |
|
|
Growth |
mination |
tary |
rating |
|
20 is perfect |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developing new medicines built from synergistic combinations of approved drugs. |
|
|
cHTS approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. CRXX. Uses its combination high throughput screening, or cHTS, technology, to systematically |
|
screen pair-wise combinations from its library of approximately 2,000 United States, European |
|
and Japanese approved drugs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. In cell-based assays corresponding to major diseases such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, |
|
asthma, psoriasis and diabetes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Using these cell-based assays, cHTS technology screens the effects of millions of possible |
|
dose-specific combinations of existing drugs in each of our selected disease models. |
|
|
Discoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Has discovered pairs of approved drugs which in preclinical studies exhibit a therapeutic effect |
|
against a model for a target disease when applied in combination, |
|
|
|
. Even though neither drug is indicated for such disease on its own. |
|
|
|
. Also discovered pairs of drugs where CRXX's preclinical studies suggest the effectiveness or |
|
safety of one drug in its primary disease indication may be improved by combining it with another |
|
drug that, on its own, is not indicated for that disease. |
|
|
|
|
Advantages of CRXX's Approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Early stage drug candidates often fail. |
|
|
|
|
|
. CRXX'ss approach seeks to address this high failure rate by pursuing a portfolio strategy for drug |
|
discovery and development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. By applying cHTS technology to screen for the biological effects of combinations of approved |
|
drugs in disease models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. CRXX has identified multiple product candidates for selected major diseases and advanced them |
|
into proof-of-concept clinical trials. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active ingredients are approved drugs |
|
|
|
|
|
. Because the active pharmaceutical ingredients in CRXX"s product candidates are themselves |
|
approved drugs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. CRXX has been able to move seven of product candidates into human clinical studies without the |
|
need to first complete many of the extensive preclinical toxicology and pharmacology studies |
|
generally required before initiating clinical trials for a new chemical entity. |
|
|
|
. This approach allows CRXX to make early development decisions based studies in patients, |
|
rather than only on studies in animals. |
|
|
|
|
|
Product candidates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immuno-Inflammatory Disease Program |
|
|
|
|
|
. CRXX currently has six clinical stage product candidates targeting immuno-inflammatory |
|
diseases and multiple additional preclinical product candidates. |
|
|
|
Oncology (cancer) Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. CRXX's oncology product pipeline includes dual-action agents in clinical and preclinical |
|
|
development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metabolic Diseases and Other Preclinical Programs |
|
|
|
|
. CRXX's preclinical pipeline includes multiple product candidates targeted for potential |
|
|
development in Type II diabetes, other metabolic diseases, oncology and multiple immuno |
|
inflammatory diseases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Five product candidates are in proof-of-concept studies in patients, or phase IIa trials, and a sixth |
|
product candidate is planned to enter phase IIa clinical trials in 2005. |
|
|
|
. In addition, CRXX is testing our oncology product candidate in patients with advanced cancers |
|
who have failed one or more prior therapies. These oncology trials, referred to here as phase I/II |
|
trials, are designed to evaluate safety, response rate, dosage levels and other factors. |
|
|
Competition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Will be competing against a wide range of pharmaceutical and life science companies that have |
|
greater resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discovery technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Seeks to create barriers to entry for other pharmaceutical companies by filing patent applications |
|
for technology and by protecting trade secrets |
|
|
|
|
|
. Many companies have already developed and employ high throughput screening technologies. . |
|
Should these companies seek to apply these technologies to the discovery of combination drugs, |
|
CRXX drug discovery technology may be rendered obsolete or noncompetitive. |
|
|
Use of $59.8mm in IPO proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Development of our current portfolio of seven clinical stage product candidates; |
|
|
• Development of our preclinical stage product candidates. |
|
|
|
|
• Discovery and development of additional product candidates; |
|
|
|
• Further development of drug discovery technology; and |
|
|
|
|
• Working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. |
|
|
=================================== |
|
|
|
|
|
March 4 |
Aspreva Pharma |
ASPV, 1-Star, C |
|
|
|
|
|
commercializes approved drugs |
|
|
|
Post-IPO shrs:32.95mm |
|
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
IPO Mkt |
|
|
Revenue ($mm) |
|
none |
none |
none |
Cap (mm) |
|
|
R&D |
|
0.07 |
1.20 |
10.10 |
$461 |
|
|
Income (loss) ($mm) |
|
-$0.2 |
-$2.5 |
-$22.5 |
@$14 |
|
|
VALUATION RATIOS |
IPO Mrkt |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
% offered |
|
|
Cap (mm) |
Sales |
Earnings |
BookValue |
TangibleBV |
in IPO |
|
March 4 |
AsprevaPharma ASPV |
461 |
124.7 |
-19.2 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
22% |
|
SCORECARD |
|
Mgt |
Market |
Market Do- |
Proprie- |
Total |
|
1-5, 5 is high |
|
|
Growth |
mination |
tary |
rating |
|
20 is perfect |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercializes new indications for approved drugs and drug candidates for underserved |
|
patient populations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Collaborate with pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies to pursue new |
|
|
indication approvals which lie beyond their strategic focus. |
|
|
|
|
. Intends to assume the clinical, regulatory and commercial activities for these non-core |
|
|
indications of collaborators’ existing drugs. |
|
|
|
|
|
. Seeks collaborations with companies that have approved drugs and drug candidates |
|
|
that ASPV believes have compelling scientific, clinical and commercial potential. |
|
|
Example |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. CellCept is a drug currently approved in the United States, European Union, Canada |
|
|
and other countries for the prevention of organ transplant rejection. |
|
|
|
ASPV believes that CellCept also has the potential to be effective in treating a variety of |
|
|
autoimmune diseases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration with Roche |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. In July 2003, entered into first collaboration with Roche for the drug CellCept. |
|
|
. ASPV is responsible for clinical development, preparing regulatory filings and, following |
|
|
regulatory approval, commercialization, marketing and promotion of CellCept for use in |
|
|
autoimmune indications. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Roche will manufacture, distribute and record sales of CellCept. |
|
|
|
. Starting April 1, 2005 and during the term of the agreement, Roche is obligated to pay, |
|
|
on a quarterly basis, an amount equal to half of any incremental net sales of CellCept |
|
|
attributed to the use of CellCept for non-transplant indications above a negotiated |
|
|
baseline of 134 million Swiss Francs, or CHF, per year. |
|
|
|
|
Competition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CellCept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. In the transplant market, CellCept currently competes with Myfortic, which is marketed |
|
|
by Novartis. Myfortic is approved only for the prevention of kidney rejection. If additional |
|
|
indications are approved for CellCept, Novartis may choose to compete in these markets |
|
by also pursuing clinical trials in autoimmune indications. |
|
|
|
|
. If approved, CellCept will compete with immunosuppressants, the current standard of |
|
|
care for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, such as steroids and cytotoxic agents, |
|
|
including cyclophosophamide, cyclosporine and azathioprine. |
|
|
|
. In addition, ASPV is aware that the following companies have products in development |
|
|
or on the market that may be competitive with CellCept in lupus nephritis: La Jolla |
|
|
Pharmaceuticals Co., Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., Human Genome Sciences Inc., |
|
|
Genelabs Technologies Inc., Genentech Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Novartis AG |
|
|
and Bristol Myers Squibb Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. ASPV is also aware that the following companies have products in development that |
|
|
may be competitive with CellCept in myasthenia gravis: Novo Nordisk A/ S, Corixa |
|
|
Corporation and Cambridge Neuroscience, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
. Ttwo companies are developing potential therapies for pemphigus vulgaris: Alexion |
|
|
Antibody Technologies, Inc. and Peptimmune, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Use of $90.7mm in IPO proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• $14.0 million to commence planned Phase III clinical trial for the use of CellCept in the |
|
|
induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis; |
|
|
|
|
• $6.0 million to continue Phase III clinical trial for the use of CellCept to treat myasthenia |
|
gravis; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• $5.0 million to continue Phase III clinical trial for the use of CellCept to treat pemphigus |
|
vulgaris; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• $15.0 million to fund market research, continuing medical education, medical liaisons |
|
|
and product launch preparation for CellCept. |
|
|
|
|
|
=================================== |
|
|
|
|
|
note: TRGT was postponed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 |
Targacept (TRGT) |
TRGT, 1-Star, C |
|
|
|
|
|
biopharmaceutical |
|
|
|
|
Post-IPO shrs:20.37mm |
|
Winston-Salem, North Carolina |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
IPO Mkt |
|
|
Revenue ($mm) |
|
$2.3 |
$2.5 |
$3.7 |
Cap (mm) |
|
|
R&D |
|
$16 |
$18 |
$23 |
$244 |
|
|
Income (loss) ($) |
|
-$21 |
-$19 |
-$24 |
@$12 |
|
|
VALUATION RATIOS |
IPO Mrkt |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
% offered |
|
|
Cap (mm) |
Sales |
Earnings |
BookValue |
TangibleBV |
in IPO |
|
Feb 25 |
Targacept (TRGT) |
244 |
66.1 |
-10.2 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
31% |
|
SCORECARD |
|
Mgt |
Market |
Market Do- |
Proprie- |
Total |
|
1-5, 5 is high |
|
|
Growth |
mination |
tary |
rating |
|
20 is perfect |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Biopharmaceutical targeting a new class of drugs to treat multiple diseases and disorders |
|
. By selectively targeting a class of receptors known as neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, |
|
or NNRs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Has worldwide commercialization rights for all of product candidates |
|
|
|
Focus and product candidates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Three therapeutic areas: cognitive impairment, pain and depression. |
|
|
|
. Within these areas, has three product candidates in clinical development and three preclinical |
|
product candidates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Expects to advance one of the preclinical product candidates into clinical development in the first |
|
half of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Also has multiple preclinical programs for target indications outside these areas, which TRGT |
|
believes NNRs can be exploited for medical benefit. |
|
|
|
|
Inversein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product candidate currently in a Phase II clinical trial as an add-on therapy in patients with major |
|
depressive disorder, is approved in the United States for moderately severe to severe essential |
|
hypertension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRGT believes that Inversine is the only FDA-approved product designed to target an NNR. |
|
Sources of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Since August 2000, funded operations primarily through private placement of equity securities |
|
and, to a much lesser extent, through payments received from our collaborators, equipment and |
|
building lease incentive financing, sales of our product Inversine and government grants. |
|
|
History |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Traces scientific lineage to a research program initiated by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in |
|
1982 to study the activity and effects of nicotine in the body and the function of nicotinic |
|
|
acetylcholine receptors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Incorporated in Delaware in 1997 as a wholly owned subsidiary of RJR. |
|
|
|
. In August 2000, we became an independent company when we issued shares of our series B |
|
convertible preferred stock to outside investors. |
|
|
|
|
|
Competition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial competition from therapies designed to target NNRs (neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine |
|
receptors) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Pfizer, with an NNR-targeted compound in Phase III for smoking cessation, and Abbott |
|
|
Laboratories, with an NNR-targeted compound in Phase II for Alzheimer’s disease, ADHD and |
|
schizophrenia and a second NNR-targeted compound in Phase I for pain. |
|
|
|
. In addition, companies with active NNR-based research programs include Merck & Co., |
|
AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Synthélabo, Memory Pharmaceuticals, Critical Therapeutics and |
|
NeuroSearch A/S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While there is currently no approved product either for AAMI or for cognitive impairment |
|
|
associated with schizophrenia, primary competitive products include |
|
|
|
• for mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as Aricept from |
|
Pfizer, Reminyl from Johnson & Johnson and Exelon from Novartis and for moderate to severe |
|
Alzheimer’s disease, Namenda from Forest Laboratories, which acts by regulating the |
|
|
neurotransmitter glutamate; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• for pain, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as Celebrex from Pfizer and opioids such as |
|
OxyContin from Purdue Pharma; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• for depression, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as Prozac from Eli Lilly, |
|
|
Paxil/Seroxar from GlaxoSmithKline, Zoloft from Pfizer, Celexa from Forest Laboratories and |
|
Lexapro from Forest Laboratories and the dual uptake inhibitor Effexor from Wyeth; |
|
|
• for schizophrenia, anti-psychotics such as Zyprexa from Eli Lilly, Risperdal from Johnson & |
|
Johnson and Abilify from Bristol-Myers Squibb; and |
|
|
|
|
• for smoking cessation, Zyban from GlaxoSmithKline. |
|
|
|
|
Use of $67.8mm in IPO proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund clinical trials, preclinical testing and other research and development activities |
|
|
• $25 million to fund further development of ispronicline, product candidate for conditions marked |
|
by cognitive impairment that afflict the elderly, including Alzheimer’s disease and AAMI; |
|
|
• $2 million to fund further development of TC-1827, product candidate for cognitive impairment |
|
associated with schizophrenia; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• $12 million to fund further development of TC-2696, product candidate for acute post-operative |
|
pain; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• $3 million to complete ongoing Phase II clinical trial of Inversine as an add-on therapy in |
|
patients with major depressive disorder; |
|
|
|
|
|
• $2 million to conduct the additional preclinical toxicology studies necessary to support an IND |
|
for clinical trials of TC-2216; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
• $24 million to fund general and administrative expenses, other research and development |
|
expenses, working capital needs and other general corporate purposes. |
|
|
|
==================================== |
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 |
ViaCell |
VIAC, 2-Stars, B- |
|
|
|
|
|
biotechnology company enabling the use of human cells as medicine |
Post-IPO shrs:36.1mm |
|
Boston, MA |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Sept 9 mos |
IPO Mkt |
|
|
Revenue (mm) ($) |
$7.3 |
$20.4 |
$31.9 |
$28.6 |
Cap (mm) |
|
|
Gross margin % |
57.5% |
71.1% |
77.6% |
80.7% |
$289 |
|
|
R&D |
$7.0 |
$11.4 |
$13.2 |
$11.7 |
@$8 |
|
|
Inprocess tech* |
$0.6 |
$5.9 |
$23.9 |
|
|
|
|
*cost of acquiring technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) ($) |
-22.1 |
-36.0 |
-55.5 |
-15.9 |
|
|
|
Income (loss) (%) |
-302.7% |
-176.5% |
-174.0% |
-55.6% |
|
|
|
VALUATION RATIOS |
IPO Mrkt |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
% offered |
|
|
Cap (mm) |
Sales |
Earnings |
BookValue |
TangibleBV |
in IPO |
|
Jan 21 |
ViaCell (VIAC) |
289 |
3.2 |
-14.4 |
4.0 |
4.4 |
21% |
|
SCORECARD |
|
Mgt |
Market |
Market Do- |
Proprie- |
Total |
|
1-5, 5 is high |
|
|
Growth |
mination |
tary |
rating |
|
20 is perfect |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enabling the use of human cells as medicine |
|
|
|
|
|
. An early stage of development for cellular therapeutic candidates and has recently initiated the |
|
first clinical trial for the lead product candidate, CB001. |
|
|
|
|
. Developing a pipeline of other proprietary product candidates intended to address cancer, cardiac |
|
diseases, and infertility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Also has a commercial business dedicated to the preservation of umbilical cord blood, an |
|
abundant source of stem cells for potential therapeutic use. |
|
|
|
. Currently generates revenue from cord blood preservation activities, which VIAC markets as its |
|
Viacord product. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. In December 2003, VIAC entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Amgen under |
|
which VIAC received a non-exclusive license to certain Amgen stem cell growth factors for use in |
|
developing and manufacturing cell therapy products |
|
|
|
|
. Amgen received an option to collaborate with VIAC on development and commercialization of |
|
any product, including CB001, that incorporates an Amgen growth factor or technology. |
|
|
. Amgen made a $20 million equity investment in VIAC. |
|
|
|
|
. In addition, VIAC has an agreement with Genzyme, an equity investor in ViaCell, under which |
|
Genzyme provides scientific support in the area of islet stem cell research. |
|
|
. VIAC also has entered into relationships with academic institutions and other companies. |
|
Product and Product Candidates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CB001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Lead cellular therapy product candidate, CB001, is initially being developed by us for use as a |
|
substitute for bone marrow and other hematopoietic stem cell transplants. CB001 is a proprietary, |
|
highly concentrated and purified population of stem cells |
|
|
|
|
. Currently enrolling patients in a Phase I clinical trial |
|
|
|
|
Viacord |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Viacord customers are expectant parents who have entrusted us with their child’s umbilical cord |
|
blood, which VIAC processes into a cellular therapeutic and cryopreserve, or preserve by freezing, |
|
for potential future use by that child or a sibling |
|
|
|
|
|
. VIAC believes it is one of the leaders in the emerging private, or family, cord blood preservation |
|
industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oocytes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Preservation and storage of human oocytes: VIAC has an exclusive license to a proprietary |
|
cryopreserving media that allows VIAC to preserve oocytes. A study of the application of this |
|
media published in Human Reproduction, a peer-reviewed journal, documented four pregnancies |
|
and five live births following 11 embryo transfers. VIAC is working with in vitro fertilization |
|
|
centers to demonstrate additional births using this technology. |
|
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Currently owns or has exclusively in-licensed the five US patents |
|
|
|
. Three of the owned and issued US patents are directed to methods of manufacturing target |
|
populations of primary cells for use as cellular medicines. These patents broadly cover the use of |
|
selection elements to select a target population of cells continuously, intermittently during, or after |
|
a culture phase. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. The Selective Amplification technology covered by these patents is core to the manufacture of |
|
VIAC's lead stem cell product candidate, CB001. These patents expire in 2014 if not extended. |
|
Corresponding international applications are pending. |
|
|
|
|
. One of VIAC's owned and issued US patents is directed to the method of making hemangioblast |
|
cells from a neonatal source. This patent broadly covers the derivation and growth of human |
|
hemangioblasts from a non-fetal source. This patent expires in 2017 if not extended. |
|
|
Corresponding international applications are pending. |
|
|
|
|
. One of VIAC's exclusively in-licensed and issued US patents is directed to a method of |
|
cryopreserving human oocytes. This patent is broadly directed at cryopreservation of a human |
|
oocyte, using proprietary media so that the oocyte enters into a dormant state and is then stored for |
|
future use. This patent expires in 2017 if not extended. |
|
|
|
|
. VIAC owns two pending US patent applications directed to compositions and methods of using |
|
USSCs to treat a broad class of diseases. |
|
|
|
|
|
. Furthermore, VIAC owns outright or has exclusively in-licensed 52 international patent |
|
|
applications. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. In addition, VIAC has non-exclusive licenses to 30 US patents and patent applications and 86 |
|
foreign patents and patent applications, including patents covering growth factors used in VIAC's |
|
Selective Amplification process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stem cell therapy competitors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Stem cell therapy competitors with products that could potentially compete with CB001 include |
|
commercial and development-stage companies offering or intending to offer stem cell products |
|
derived from bone marrow, cord blood or mobilized peripheral blood, or devices or services for |
|
processing and producing cells derived from these tissues, for use in stem cell transplants. Specific |
|
competitors include Aastrom Biosciences, Celgene, Cellerant, Gamida-Cell and Osiris |
|
|
Therapeutics. Companies with the most advanced products potentially competitive with CB001 |
|
include Gamida-Cell and Osiris Therapeutics. |
|
|
|
|
|
. Gamida-Cell, a private company based in Israel, has a hematopoetic stem cell product candidate |
|
made from umbilical cord blood that is intended for use in hematopoietic stem cell transplants, |
|
similar to CB001. Gamida-Cell’s product candidate is currently being evaluated in a Phase I |
|
clinical trial. Osiris Therapeutics, a private company based in the US, has a mesenchymal stem |
|
cell product candidate isolated from bone marrow that is intended for use in conjunction with |
|
transplantation of conventional bone marrow or cord blood cells. Osiris’ product candidate has |
|
already completed Phase I testing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. In addition to these cell therapy products, competition for CB001 may be in the form of new and |
|
better drugs to treat leukemias, lymphomas, myelomas and certain genetic diseases. |
|
|
Stem cell therapies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. VIAC is aware of several competitors developing stem cell therapies for the treatment of cardiac |
|
disease, including GenVec, Genzyme, Bioheart, Osiris Therapeutics, and potentially others. |
|
GenVec, Genzyme, and Bioheart are all developing products consisting of skeletal myoblasts |
|
isolated from muscle, expanded in culture, and injected into a patient’s heart to repair dead tissue. |
|
All three companies’ products are currently in clinical studies: Bioheart completed a Phase I study |
|
in 2002; GenVec is currently conducting its Phase I study; and Genzyme is currently recruiting |
|
patients for its Phase II study. Osiris’s product candidate consists of mesenchymal stem cells |
|
isolated from donor bone marrow, expanded in culture, and is intended to be injected into a |
|
patient’s heart to prevent scar tissue. Osiris has publicly stated that it intends to file an IND to |
|
begin clinical studies in 2004. Other companies, including Hydra Biosciences, have pre-clinical |
|
development efforts using growth factors to stimulate repair of endogenous heart tissue. |
|
|
Cord blood preservation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. Competitors in the cord blood preservation industry include the approximately 20 other national |
|
private family cord blood banks in the United States, including California Cryobank, Cbr Systems |
|
(Cord Blood Registry), Cryo-Cell International, CorCell, LifeBank |