IPOdesktop.com, Pre-IPO grading & scoring methodology
Shutterfly (SFLY)updated Friday, September 29 to a trading price of $16
|
Shutterfly |
SLFY, C, 6 |
|||||
|
online photo service |
Post-IPO shrs:24mm |
|||||
|
Redwood City, CA |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
6mos June |
6mos 2005 |
IPO Mkt |
|
Rev ($mm) |
$31.0 |
$54.0 |
$84.0 |
$36.5 |
$27.0 |
Cap (mm) |
|
Gross profit |
54.8% |
55.6% |
56.0% |
49.3% |
51.9% |
$378 |
|
Operating income % |
8.1% |
8.1% |
5.8% |
-16.7% |
-5.2% |
@$16 |
|
Income ($mm) |
$2.0 |
$3.7 |
$28.5 |
-$3.7 |
-$1.3 |
|
|
Net income % |
6.5% |
6.9% |
33.9% |
-10.1% |
-4.8% |
|
|
Notes |
||||||
|
. Six months revenue growth on a comparative basis is 35% |
||||||
|
. Notice declining gross profit, and non-profitable operations for the June six months |
||||||
|
Non-recurring |
||||||
|
. Also: 2005 results include $24.1 million in tax benefit, see the following: |
||||||
|
During the fourth quarter of 2005, SFLY concluded that it was more likely than not that it would |
||||||
|
be able to realize the benefit of deferred tax assets in the future. Consequently, SFLY recognized |
||||||
|
a non-cash tax benefit of $24.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 resulting primarily from the |
||||||
|
release of the entire net deferred tax valuation allowance |
||||||
|
. 2005 results include $3.3mm in stock-based compensation charges |
||||||
|
Adjustments |
||||||
|
. For 2005 for operating income, add back $3.3mm in stock-comp charges |
||||||
|
. Operating income is then 10% |
||||||
|
. Assume sales for the 2006 year are up the same 35% as in the first six months |
||||||
|
. Then full year sales would be $113mm |
||||||
|
. Resulting in $11.3mm in operating earnings |
||||||
|
. Assuming a combined tax rate of 40%, after tax earnings would be $4.52 million |
||||||
|
. Which is an adjusted P/E ratio of 84 based on the above assumptions |
||||||
|
VALUATION RATIOS |
IPO Mrkt |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
Price / |
% offered |
|
Cap (mm) |
Sales |
Earnings |
BookValue |
TangibleBV |
in IPO |
|
|
Shutterfly (SFLY) |
$378 |
0.5 |
-51 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
25% |
|
SCORECARD |
Mgt |
Market |
Market Do- |
Proprie- |
Total |
|
|
1-5, 5 is high |
Growth |
mination |
tary |
rating |
||
|
20 is perfect |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
|
|
Business online photo service |
||||||
|
Print revenues are derived from sales of photo processing of digital images, including sales of 4x6 |
||||||
|
prints, and the related shipping revenues from these sales. |
||||||
|
Seasonal |
||||||
|
Generates a disproportionate amount of revenues during the holiday season in the fourth quarter of the calendar year |
||||||
|
Prices declining |
||||||
|
. Historically, average selling prices for prints have declined, and they may continue to decline in |
||||||
|
the future. |
||||||
|
. For example, in the second quarter of 2005, certain competitors reduced the list prices of their |
||||||
|
4ื6 prints from $0.29 to $0.12. |
||||||
|
. In response, SFLY lowered the list price of 4ื6 prints to $0.19 in order to remain competitive. |
||||||
|
This decrease negatively affected print revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006. |
||||||
|
. A further drop in 4ื6 prices without a corresponding increase in volume would also |
||||||
|
negatively impact net revenues. |
||||||
|
. Larger competitors could elect to further reduce the list prices of their 4ื6 prints or use lower |
||||||
|
pricing of prints as a loss leader. If this were to occur, we might not be able to remain competitive |
||||||
|
on pricing for 4ื6 prints, which could result in a loss of customers. |
||||||
|
Competiton |
||||||
|
Online digital photography services companies such as Kodak EasyShare Gallery (formerly |
||||||
|
known as Ofoto), Snapfish, which is a service of Hewlett-Packard, Sonys ImageStation and |
||||||
|
others; |
||||||
|
"Big Box" retailers such as Wal-Mart, Costco and others that are seeking to offer low cost |
||||||
|
digital photography products and services, such as in-store fulfillment and self-service kiosks for |
||||||
|
printing, and that may, among other strategies, offer their customers heavily discounted in-store |
||||||
|
products and services that compete directly with our offerings; |
||||||
|
Drug stores such as Walgreens, CVS and others that offer in-store pick-up from Internet orders; |
||||||
|
Regional photography companies such as Wolf Camera and Ritz Camera that have established |
||||||
|
brands and customer bases in existing photography markets; |
||||||
|
Internet portals and search engines such as Yahoo!, AOL, Google and CNET that offer broad |
||||||
|
reaching digital photography and related products and services to their large user bases; |
||||||
|
Home printing service providers such as Hewlett-Packard, Epson and Canon, that are seeking to |
||||||
|
expand their printer and ink businesses by gaining market share in the emerging digital |
||||||
|
photography marketplace; and |
||||||
|
Photo-related software companies such as Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, Corel and others. |
||||||
|
Use of $78mm in IPO proceeds |
||||||
|
. Expects capital expenditures to be between $30 million and $35 million in the second half of |
||||||
|
2006 and through 2007, which will be funded by a combination of cash and cash equivalents, |
||||||
|
expected cash flows from operations and the net proceeds from the offering. |
||||||
|
. Expects to spend approximately half of this amount to purchase manufacturing equipment, obtain |
||||||
|
new manufacturing facilities and on improvements to our new and existing manufacturing |
||||||
|
facilities, with the remainder to be allocated for the purchase of website infrastructure equipment. |
||||||